<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Selections from FILM CULTURE Magazine (1955-1996)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bavatuesdays.com/selections-from-film-culture-magazine-1955-1996/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bavatuesdays.com/selections-from-film-culture-magazine-1955-1996/</link>
	<description>a "b" blog</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 14:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tony D'Ambra</title>
		<link>http://bavatuesdays.com/selections-from-film-culture-magazine-1955-1996/#comment-29659</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony D'Ambra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 04:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bavatuesdays.com/selections-from-film-culture-magazine-1955-1996/#comment-29659</guid>
		<description>Tks for this post Jim.

The article by Bunuel is short and is worth reading in its entirety: &lt;a href="http://www.ubu.com/papers/bunuel_luis-statement.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Luis BuÃ±uel &#34;A 
Statement&#34; (1960)&lt;/a&gt;.

Bunuel also says inter-alia:

&lt;blockquote&gt;
	&lt;i&gt;Unfortunately, the great majority of today's films... glory in an 
	intellectual and moral vacuum. In this vacuum, movies seem to prosper...&#160; 
	If a man in the audience shares the joys and sorrows of a character on the 
	screen, it should be because that character reflects the joys and sorrows of 
	all society and so the personal feelings of that man in the audience. 
	Unemployment, insecurity, the fear of war, social injustice, etc., affect 
	all men of our time, and thus, they also affect the individual spectator.&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Sadly nothing has changed in nearly 50 years - not only in Hollywood but elsewhere.

Ironically though, in Bunuel's case, like many others film-makers, including Orson Welles, he never made a movie that appealed to a "man in the audience".  This is the tragedy of much of the film-making that aspires to a grander vision: they are too intellectual and distant from the lives of everyman.  For a film to connect with the audience, there must be an emotive and shared experience, not intellectual musing and cold detachment where technique overwhelms deeper universal meaning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style='float: right; margin-left: 10px;' src='http://www.gravatar.com/avatar.php?gravatar_id=c5f117ee3dfb991fb6208a58c568658d&amp;size=60&amp;default=http%3A%2F%2Fuse.perl.org%2Fimages%2Fpix.gif' alt='' />Tks for this post Jim.</p>
<p>The article by Bunuel is short and is worth reading in its entirety: <a href="http://www.ubu.com/papers/bunuel_luis-statement.html" rel="nofollow">Luis BuÃ±uel &quot;A<br />
Statement&quot; (1960)</a>.</p>
<p>Bunuel also says inter-alia:</p>
<blockquote><p>
	<i>Unfortunately, the great majority of today&#8217;s films&#8230; glory in an<br />
	intellectual and moral vacuum. In this vacuum, movies seem to prosper&#8230;&nbsp;<br />
	If a man in the audience shares the joys and sorrows of a character on the<br />
	screen, it should be because that character reflects the joys and sorrows of<br />
	all society and so the personal feelings of that man in the audience.<br />
	Unemployment, insecurity, the fear of war, social injustice, etc., affect<br />
	all men of our time, and thus, they also affect the individual spectator.</i>
</p></blockquote>
<p>Sadly nothing has changed in nearly 50 years - not only in Hollywood but elsewhere.</p>
<p>Ironically though, in Bunuel&#8217;s case, like many others film-makers, including Orson Welles, he never made a movie that appealed to a &#8220;man in the audience&#8221;.  This is the tragedy of much of the film-making that aspires to a grander vision: they are too intellectual and distant from the lives of everyman.  For a film to connect with the audience, there must be an emotive and shared experience, not intellectual musing and cold detachment where technique overwhelms deeper universal meaning.
<div style='clear:both'></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
