<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Syndicate, syndicate, syndicate the semester away</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bavatuesdays.com/syndicate-syndicate-syndicate-the-semester-away/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bavatuesdays.com/syndicate-syndicate-syndicate-the-semester-away/</link>
	<description>a "b" blog</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 02:49:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reverend</title>
		<link>http://bavatuesdays.com/syndicate-syndicate-syndicate-the-semester-away/comment-page-1/#comment-76176</link>
		<dc:creator>Reverend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 04:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bavatuesdays.com/?p=1689#comment-76176</guid>
		<description>Steve,This sounds interesting, what do you mean exactly by changing post organizations to latest comments? What I always thought would be useful (and the plugin/application for WordPress does this) is creates a link from a post to a forum. The post is reproduced in the forum, and you can treat the idea as a forum thread. The user publishing the post should be able to decide whether they want the post to be a thread.  In this way, they can keep all their writings central in their blog, and leave the discussion to the forum.  But why not let the discussion happen in a distributed manner on the blogs?  Well, that takes getting used to for folks who don;t use blogs, but the ability to control your own space is empowering.  Yet, an issue that constantly plagues bloggers and commentators is th ability to control and archive comments you make on other people's blog.  There is still no way to republish your comments back to your blog without copy and paste, and many of these comments may be something you want ot preserve. Co-comment tried this, but it isn't pretty.  The ability to comment on other folks work, while preserving a copy of your comment with a link to its context would be a key element on such an environment. 


It's not always the integration of these apps that is top priority, but the ability to get their info out should they want.  I record of their thinking that they can take with them. That is the key in my mind, but I am often wrong :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style='float: right; margin-left: 10px;' src='http://www.gravatar.com/avatar.php?gravatar_id=a3ce4e45c979a8523a2098808847fcc5&amp;size=60&amp;default=http%3A%2F%2Fuse.perl.org%2Fimages%2Fpix.gif' alt='' />Steve,This sounds interesting, what do you mean exactly by changing post organizations to latest comments? What I always thought would be useful (and the plugin/application for WordPress does this) is creates a link from a post to a forum. The post is reproduced in the forum, and you can treat the idea as a forum thread. The user publishing the post should be able to decide whether they want the post to be a thread.  In this way, they can keep all their writings central in their blog, and leave the discussion to the forum.  But why not let the discussion happen in a distributed manner on the blogs?  Well, that takes getting used to for folks who don;t use blogs, but the ability to control your own space is empowering.  Yet, an issue that constantly plagues bloggers and commentators is th ability to control and archive comments you make on other people&#8217;s blog.  There is still no way to republish your comments back to your blog without copy and paste, and many of these comments may be something you want ot preserve. Co-comment tried this, but it isn&#8217;t pretty.  The ability to comment on other folks work, while preserving a copy of your comment with a link to its context would be a key element on such an environment. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s not always the integration of these apps that is top priority, but the ability to get their info out should they want.  I record of their thinking that they can take with them. That is the key in my mind, but I am often wrong <img src='http://bavatuesdays.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />
<div style='clear:both'></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Egan</title>
		<link>http://bavatuesdays.com/syndicate-syndicate-syndicate-the-semester-away/comment-page-1/#comment-76173</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Egan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 19:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bavatuesdays.com/?p=1689#comment-76173</guid>
		<description>I've been thinking about how it would be possible to create wiki, forum and blog functionality done through all three of the technologies.

With the feed abilities described it might be possible to create the equivalent of a forum with blog posts and comments working like forum threads. The difference is changing the post organization to latest comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style='float: right; margin-left: 10px;' src='http://www.gravatar.com/avatar.php?gravatar_id=33bebc8d7315089def79cb729faf344a&amp;size=60&amp;default=http%3A%2F%2Fuse.perl.org%2Fimages%2Fpix.gif' alt='' />I&#8217;ve been thinking about how it would be possible to create wiki, forum and blog functionality done through all three of the technologies.</p>
<p>With the feed abilities described it might be possible to create the equivalent of a forum with blog posts and comments working like forum threads. The difference is changing the post organization to latest comment.
<div style='clear:both'></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
