‘Some caveats / things to note’ or, the bava according to ChatGPT

  • The blog is quite wide-ranging. If you are looking for very focused, academic writing, you may need to dig into specific posts.
  • The author has a casual, personal tone—so the writing is less formal than peer-reviewed work.
  • While the blog is influential in certain communities (edtech/open web), its reach may be more niche compared to large-scale academic journals or publications.
This entry was posted in bavatuesdays and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to ‘Some caveats / things to note’ or, the bava according to ChatGPT

  1. Alan Levine says:

    I change all my criticisms and doubts for GenAI. Here we have clear evidence it has reached that plateau of origina thinking and rational reasoning. It gets an A+ on the Tur[d]ing test 😉

  2. Alan Levine says:

    It looks like my ChatGPT reply got munched by the blog.

    I did give it some prompt direction- see the lively exchange https://chatgpt.com/share/690fd78a-2730-8002-b555-697d09829571

    • Reverend says:

      I am so stupid I thought that was a real response you wrote and I was like wow, Alan is so thoughtful. Now I now you are just a machine grubbing, anti-creative 🙂 But mroe that that, you’re fun!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.