Does Ed-Tech have an Ethos?

The dynamic duo at AMICAL conference brining the ethos hammer down!

The dynamic duo at AMICAL conference brining the ethos hammer down!

This is the question that guided the interactive presentation Maha Bali and I gave together at the AMICAL conference in Rome last month. We finally got around to write about that presentation for the AMICAL blog, and you can find that post here. I won’t go into too much detail because that’s why we wrote the post, but it was really a pleasure to both co-present and co-author with Maha. I’ve gotten quite used to the idea of co-teaching ds106 with folks like Martha Burtis, Alan Levine, and Paul Bond, but I haven’t yet perfected the art of co-presenting and, especially, co-authoring posts. I’m so used to being a lone blogger that writing with someone else seems unnatural. That said, the final product is usually much better given that you have to read, re-read, negotiate, and feedback. And Maha is uncompromising, and I like that about her—it’s what makes us a good team.

Anyway, I particularly enjoyed this session because it brought into sharp relief (and directly challenged) the oft-repeated cliché “It’s not about the technology, “or “it’s not about the tool.” The idea of framing the session around the specific ethos of a tool we use like the LMS, Turnitin, Google Apps, etc., was all Maha’s, and I think it was an absolutely perfect frame for our session. We spent the session articulating—with the help of the audience—how the technology tools we use for teaching and learning have an embedded ethos and directly impact our practice. I like interactive, “in-your-face” sessions like this one, and we really benefitted from an engaged group of academics and librarians  that were willing to take the challenge and push back accordingly. There is no progress without struggle!

This entry was posted in presentations and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Does Ed-Tech have an Ethos?

  1. Maha Bali says:

    Hey Jim. I have been thinking a lot lately about collaboration in our line of work and I realized reading your post that I do so much of it in all the areas – co-teaching (for credit and not for-credit), co-authorship (which I enjoy and learn from very much while recognizing it takes a lot more work than single authorship – each of us can write 3 blogs/day but it took us a month to co-author this) and co-presenting (this is the trickiest one as u share a stage with someone you need to feel comfy with and I took the risk 3 times this year co-presenting with an online friend and IT ROCKED because it turns out we really do know each other well enough to do that!)

    Really really enjoyed working on both the presentation and the article with you, Jim 🙂

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.