DTLT Today Episode 111: Jon Pineda’s Open Doors

This episode of DTLT Today features UMW Creative Writing professor Jon Pineda. It’s Jon’s first year at UMW, but that didn’t stop him from jumping into the Domain of One’s Own fray with both feet. He’s been experimenting with domains in the classes he teaches, and as well as a space to imagine various creative projects as part of his own work. He’s even bringing the literary journal Font: Poetry he created for high school students in Chesapeake, Virginia into the virtual world as a part of his work with the Domain of One’s Own faculty initiative.

So, when Jon and I sat down this afternoon to talk I imagined we would spend most of out time talking about these various projects, but in the end we didn’t. We talked about his work. We talked about his memoir Sleep In Me—which sounds devastatingly brilliant. We talked about skateboarding. We talked about Michelangelo as bad teacher. We talked about demystifying the process of writing. We talked about the wonder of memory. We talked about  the power of open. In fact, we talked about a whole lotta things, and it was one of the most rewarding conversations I’ve yet to have as part of this series.

If you have 48 minutes, or even just four or five, take the time and listen to a truly engaging and compassionate storyteller frame the wonder he finds through the open doors of his imagination.

Posted in dtlt, DTLT Today | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

My Friend Max

CineramaDomeBack in Fall I got a PS3 at home, we also go a HD television which replaced by 27″ tube after more than 15 years of hard work. On principle I hate how home theaters have eroded cinema culture, but in reality over the last six months I have loved my TV. Millions of widescreen, high-definition images reflecting off my eyes in the comfort of my den each evening doesn’t suck, even if it’s not the L.A. Cinerama Dome. What’s more, the 42″ TV fits perfectly in the built-in bookshelves, it really ties the room together.

None of this is particularly interesting, I know, but it’s somewhat of confession for me. I have resisted home theater for more than a decade, but I my defenses have fallen. I don’t want to be right any more! Not to mention it’s all become much, much cheaper, which helps out a lot.

Anyway, I wrote all that to say this. I’ve made a new friend recently thanks to this new setup, and his name is Max. He’s actually not a he, or even a sentient being for that matter. He’s a Netflix algorithm that tries to help you find movies you’d like based on your watching habits. What’s interesting to me about this approach, which I believe is only available through the PS3 currently, is that it’s presented through the persona of a colloquial gameshow host. He’s a character, and I find him compelling. As he asks you to rate films on a scale of one to five stars he’ll quip  on the basis of your rating. For example, if I give a movie one star, he”ll say something like “That film is dead to me!” I would say that, so I obviously love this approach 🙂

netflix-max1

And as contextualized data like this works, the more I watch on Netflix the better Max gets at predicting what I will want to watch. As a result, the easier it will be for Anto and I to find movies we like on Netflix, and that’s often an issue for us that needs to be solved. It’s a creative solution particular to their service, and it’s been fun for us to play with. We get to rate movies, shoot Max’s suggestions down, and the whole thing never lasts more than a couple of minutes. He knows when he failed, and he bows out gracefully, which is pretty awesome. So much so, that when Anto, GNA Garcia and I were searching for a movie last night we turned to Max. We initially shot down his recommendations, which were all pretty good, but after further searching decided to take one of his five recommendation. Once we did, Anto noted that she “hopes Max knows as much because he seemed dejected.” I do too. Max is nice.

But am I not only blogging about Max because he is nice. It actually relates to a conversation I had recently with Svetlana Dotsenko about just this idea. I met Svetlana at the MOOC Research Conference in Dallas back in December, and we spent most of the conversation talking about nihilism in 19th century Russian literature—it was exhausting! More recently we talked about her work with Project Lever, as she’s interested in how MOOCs might connect people as they’re going through a course. Fresh off my experience with my imaginary friend Max, I was wondering aloud with her what it might be like to have an experience built into a course that connects people at the beginning of the process, as well as along the way.

While I’m not necessarily a fan of the corporate MOOC and its designs for using big data to define the educational experience therein, I remain fascinated by what it all will mean as it becomes an integral part of how we both educate and are educated. As with Max, I am interested in an approach for courses that is playful, and actually builds in a narrative experience rooted in the tropes of the discipline. What if you had a Marlowe-esque character connecting you with other people in a course on Hardboiled fiction as a result of the work you were doing. Or an evil scientist taking you through how to take over the world in Chemistry 🙂 Make a game out of it, use the localized data for the course to turn it into an even more engaging, serendipitous experience.

The idea of the course and the game converging not in the popularized imagination of a first person shooter, but rather in the more nebulous form of exposing the lattice of connections and bringing them into juxtaposition more seamlessly than ever before. This seems to me what we’ve been trying to do with wikis, blogs, Twitter, and a variety of other social media at UMW over the last decade. If more detailed data can serve to reinforce these connections through a variety of platforms I am interested in it. However, when it becomes enslaved to the ideas of massive, scale, closed, venture capital, and vendors I lose interest really quick. It goes back to an idea Brian Lamb has been talking recently that I think is right on the money, so many of these innovations go from infancy to maturity overnight, with no real time to experiment with the myriad possibilities along the way. There is little to no room to experiment because so much of the conversation around innovation in higher ed is being driven by venture-capital funded start-ups, and that a shame. Especially given the origins of MOOCs tell a radically different story. I believe universities should be a place for this development between infancy and maturity to play out for these pedagogical possibilities, but more and more we are buying back the mutantly-maturated offspring of our own idea babies 🙂

Posted in fun | Tagged , , | 9 Comments

DTLT Today Episode 110: Sue Fernsebner’s Digital History

In this episode of DTLT Today, Ryan Brazell and I sit down with History professor Sue Fernsebner to talk about the vast array of awesome projects she’s been working on over the last year. The work we discuss includes, but is not limited to: her experimentation with Twitter in the classroom; the immensely popular Tumblr, Gulou, on contemporary China she manages; GIFs as analysis in her Chinese History through Film course; the resource site on the Taiping Civil War designed alongside Ryan as part of her re-imagined History Methods course (read more about the course design here and here). The work Sue Fernsebner is doing in digital history is truly remarkable, and I hope this video starts to give you some sense of her process and approach as she takes us through  how she’s re-imagined her curriculum for the digital age over the last several years.

Posted in dtlt, DTLT Today | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Web-Teaching

Shannon Hauser has been working in the Simpson library at UMW for almsot a year now, and this afternoon she brought DTLT a couple of booksthat the they’re taking out of circulation. I love that she did, kinda makes me want to hook her up with a free domain and web hosting 🙂 One of the books she brought over is a second edition of Web-Teaching: A Guide to Designing Interactive Teaching for the Wolrd Wide Web. It was published in 2001, and it updates the state of educational technology in the four years between 1997 and 2001. I’m going to sit down with it over the next few days because it aligns with where my heads is at the moment, but Shannon pointed me immediately to this little nugget on page 41:

blackboard_free_open

A “free service,” “open to anyone for enrollment,” “thousands of courses,” “Easy-to-use software,” etc. It’s Google Apps for education and corporate MOOCs all over again. But in the end it never winds up being free or open or disruptive or innovative. It ends up being a market to exploit, and that’s where I get pissed off that we seem to be falling into the same traps. When is highered going to reclaim the web? At some point there has to be a reckoning, and be careful because the bava is heating up his flamethrower!

Image credit: All Hail the Noise Professor!

Posted in Instructional Technology | 7 Comments

The Midterm will be Open Web

Image credit: Hybrid Pedagogy

Last week the students in The Internet Course  took their midterm. What was somewhat unique about this particular test was that the students designed it. The questiosn for the test were based on the four panels discussions they ran over the first half of the semester. These panels were student-led, driven by the research they did in the first couple of weeks on specific topics such as internet history, how it works, creation/consumption, and intellectual property.

Given the students have been framing the curriculum and discussions for the class thus far, it only made sense to have them create the midterm. The result was pretty remarkable. The test is impressive, and it reminded me a bit of what happened with assignments in ds106. What’s more, the feedback students gave Paul and I on the test was interesting–almost to a student they found it both difficult and useful in forcing them to re-enagage and clarify wha we dicussed during each of the panels.

Each panel member for each of the topics was tasked with creating one question for the midterm in adding it to a Google Doc with their panel’s notes. After that, we simply transferred the questions into a Google Form- and made it live–that’s it. Despite the fact they created the test, many of them said it took them anywhere from three to four hours to finish. That’s possible because the test, rather than being a punitive measure of what they do and don’t know, became the opportunity for a guided learning experience buttressed by the open web.

Oh yeah, did I mention the midterm was open web? They were free to use the web over the course of 72 hours to answer any of the questions—none of which were multiple choice by the way. The questiosn were rigorous, student-generated, and did an excellent job of taking stock of what was covered in the first half of the semester.

Now here’s the kicker, each of the students will be grading all the answers to their particular question (or questions given a few students were on more than one panel). The answers will be anonymous, and they have the right to provide partial credit for any of the answers. Seeing how they they grade each other anonymously will be an interesting case study in and of itself.

It will be interesting to see the results of the test at the end of this week, and I am really loving some of the more intense experimentation we are doing with this course. Dr. Garcia suggested this course has been a bt quiet when it comes to an open course, and I think she’s right. Paul and I are still working through this course, and we have to get to a point of relative comfort with a brand new course before we start inviting folks. That seems to be a useful distinction between open and invitational. All the courses I’ve done over the last eight years have been open and freely available for anyone who wants to see what’s happening or use anything there.  But having the open web particpate takes another layer of imagination, design, and, more than anything, labor. And it’s that last element you really gotta gear up for. Sometimes experimentation works best on a small scale and can grow according to your comfort level.

That said, the midterm was totally open adn I even invited people to take it from the open webn, three people took me up on it. They be getting their grade this Friday.  Hey, you can take it too, why not?

Posted in The Internet Course | Tagged , , | 6 Comments

Devouring Videos

Last week was a blur, on top of  catching up on my work from the Digital Media Learning conference the week before, I came back to interviews for a fine arts professor hire, trying to write an article (which I suck at), working with faculty, the Domain of One’s Own Faculty Initiative, the Digital Scholars Institute, marvelling at the Domain of One’s Own Community site, and a lot more. You know, all the other stuff I do when I should be blogging 🙂

What struck me is that on more than a few occasions I found myself watching some really compelling videos in the office, and I wanted to share a few before I forget about them. Turns out three of the five videos below was referred by Tim Owens , who, in turn, found them on the video curation site Devour. I have since subscribed. Good videos on the internet make me very happy.

Rear Window Timelapse

While working with Art History professor JeanAnn Dabb on her Hitchcock course she turned me on to Jeff Desom‘s Rear Window Timelapse. It’s a film within a film that’s all about film, and the magic that must have been the set of Rear Window (1954). If you have three minutes and love movies, take the jump—I promise you you’ll be glad you did.

The DIY Engineer Who Built a Nuclear Reactor in His Basement

I haven’t been able to stop thinking about it. Doug Coulter is a rare character who mixes DIY culture with liberterian communism. But it’s his open source pursuit of sinking a number of multi-Trillion dollar energy corporations by cracking the nuclear fusion nut in his trailer that strikes me as beautiful. He’s quite the spokesmen of how open source could save the world 🙂 h/t Tim Owens

Monster Mash – by I AM KAWEHI

Monster Mash – by I AM KAWEHI from Kawehi on Vimeo.

Watching Kawehi take a simple audience request and turn it into ten minutes of a live looping set that is mesmerizing, brilliant, and she is just so cool about it all. I can’t get enough of this one. h/t Tim Owens

Between Two Ferns with Zach Galifianakis: President Barack Obama

This video was hysterical, this is the way to get the word out about Obamacare. Also, the use titles and lower thirds as a comedic presence got me thinking—I love that stuff.

Shark Attack 3-13-2014

I can’t go on a youtube binge without a near-death shark attack. This is as close as it gets. A man fends of a Caribbean Reef Shark while gathering lionfish in the western Caribbean.

Posted in fun, video | Tagged , , , , , , | 2 Comments

When User was Equal to Developer

Olia Lialina pointed me to this amazing post she wrote back in 2010 about what she has coded the “Prof. Dr.” style of webpages that can be dated back to 1993. In fact, the post is a tour-de-force of information about design in the early days of the web. She explains how she tries to convince her Interface Design students that the conception of site design is not reducible to Adobe’s Creative Suite. Rather, she pushes them to examine the early site design of the mid 1990s web:

….an era when the web was build and arranged and decorated by amateurs, when very web specific genres and looks were brought to existence, making it an incredible place to experience.

But even before the amateur free-for-all of the mid-90s there was the “Prof. Dr.” webpages, and I absolutely love the way Olia frames this early genre of web design:

“Prof.Dr” is a codeword, a tricky search request. I am aware of the fact that there are users outside of academia as well who always designed their sites in pure markup or redesigned according to 1993 standards recently. Still I suggest to use this name based on a scientific title as a tribute to the history, and reminder that all around the internet the very first pages were build at universities. To cement this term, within this article I’ll use only pages of senior academics holding a doctoral title.

How brilliant, an homage to the “Prof. Dr.”s who designed the web! But that’s not all, oh no, that’s not all:

A “~” in the URL continues to be part of the look and reminds of early computer culture, when “user” was equal to “developer”.(3) That’s why, where it is possible, I prefer to use the examples with a tilde.

Disco, this is what I have been looking for to complete the circle with Domain of One’s Own. The tilde was an indicator of a moment on the web when a user was equal to a developer! That’s it, we can’t turn back time, and I agree with Olia that this is not about a new retro aesthetic (although my impulse to make it that is very strong). This is about the recognition of a moment in time when a web space at a university was synonymous with developing the web. Helping to build it. In GeoCities terminology, homesteading. And that’s what we are trying to do with Domain of One’s Own, bring back a sense of web literacy in terms of design, history, and the possibilities to continue to particpate in it as an open, dare I say liberatory, space.

But Olia doesn’t stop there, she is light years ahead of me. She goes on to theorize the power of the primitive nature of these “Prof Dr.” pages.

Primitivity tells us the story of the browser being not only a browser, but also an editor. Every user of the early web was a producer of web content. Web pages were to be opened in the browser to look at them, but also to edit them, using existing pages as templates for new pages. The simple design of HTML made it possible for the first users to create state of the art pages with only four to five principal tags. The result was an extremely fast growing web. There were not many options, this is why we got many pages.

And she goes on…

Prof. Dr. pages look terribly the same. As if they were generated automatically by the browser, as one student said. Though, ironically, they are among the last pages generated completely by humans, not content management systems or services.

They look according to the viewer’s browser settings. This reveals the belief of the early 1990es that any visual design should be left at the discretion of the user.

A concept she later refers to as the “End User = Designer.” A reality long gone, and as she notes “it could only work for the very small web at connected universities.”

This is all gold, and there are innumerable examples of web pages from this era in her post. What’s more, she then moves on to the vernacular web which she dates at roughly 1995—the moment the web exploded well beyond connected universities. I really appreciate this broader conceptual frame for the early web spaces at universities as a frame for the user as both developer and designer. And I don’t necessarily take this to mean professional programmers and architects (even though the are Herr Doktors 🙂 ), as much as a community that is engaged and experimenting with form and connection through the tools that make it possible.

This brings us back, then, to a user innovation toolkit that enables and empowers people, which allows me to start making the link to the trailing edge of innovation that is the web. Olia surfaces so much of the design and conceptual thinking behind a web that returns us to some of its original magic as a web of links and people rather than third-party profiles and services. That said, I could easily fall into the dangerous trap of glorifying a moment wherein the potential of the read-write web was only available to the elite few. That’s what has changed over the last two decades in terms of access to these robust toolkits for innovation that universities have patently ignored when the need for a depp, critical web literacy has never been greater.

Posted in Domain of One's Own | Tagged , , | 7 Comments

Technology is a friend to education….

Reverend MacReady bruning it up

Nothing can make your day like finding yourself the subject of a Noise Professor photoshop. And while I may not be as serene as the great Infocult with a flamethrower in my hands, it certainly helps relieve the tension. Thanks Zack, you light up my life 🙂

Posted in fun | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

How the Web was Ghettoized for Teaching and Learning in Higher Ed?

Short answer: learning management systems.

The above title was something I tweeted out last night when I finsihed the presentation I delivered yesterday at the Digital Media Learning 2014 conference.

I’ve been working on a broader narrative for contextualizing the work we’re doing at University of Mary Washington with Domain of One’s Own. This initiative offers students and faculty a domain and web hosting so that they can more deeply inhabit and interrogate the web. For some, it’s most easily explained as an eportfolio, but for me that explanation is far too short-sighted. What’s more, it ignores higher education’s ongoing over-dependence on learning management systems (or siloed teaching and learning) for well over a decade.

Martha Burtis has been on a blog tear as of late framing our expeirence with Domain of One’s Own six months on, how we are building out community through community.umwdomains.com, as well as how faculty and students are using UMW Domains. I recommend reading Martha’s trifecta of awesome posts for a detailed account of where we are with Domains of One’s Own to date.

BgopuEuCUAAk80K

In terms of the DML presentation, after briefly explaining Domain of One’s Own and blowing the audience’s collective mind 🙂 with the greatest Richard Scarry cannibalistic pig analogy ever used for explaining how domains/web hosting work based on this post (which accounts for the first 14 slides) I moved into the core of the presentation, at least for me,  “A Brief and Incomplete History of Personal Web Spaces” starting at slide fifteen (see slide deck at bottom of post).

I’ve talked about tilde spaces (~/spaces) in relationship to Domain of One’s Own in a cursory manner before, and the idea of tilde spaces as a precursor to UMW Domains is something I’ve continued to return to in my mind. In an attempt to more concretely frame the history of web publishing at universities I started doing some initial digging since. I hope to get deeper into this reseach in the coming months because it’ a total blast, but until then, let me share out some initial discoveries.

Earlier this month, while talking about the history of personal web spaces on various campuses at the office, I sent out the following tweet to get a sense of the rough timing of whenpersonal web spaces started to show up at campuses around North America.

I got back an impressive stream of responses—more than 75 in all! I’ve embedded some of them below to give yiu an indicator of the range of dates and universities.

While some of these personal web spaces were available as early as 1993, from this informal poll it seems that 1995 was the most common date for the collective memory on Twitter. And thanks to Tim Owens taking a spin on the Wayback Machine, we discovered the earliest recorded date for personal home pages at Mary Washington College (we didn’t become a University until 2004) was Fall 1996. That’s right, Domain of One’s Own is hearkening back to a tradition almost twenty years old. There was even a “community” page offering an index of all the staff and student home pages. There’s even a link for the howto.

Mary Washington College’s personal homepage hub

A real pleasant surpise was that thanks to the awesomeness that is the Wayback Machine the links to these personal pages were archived. So we could see the various home pages of faculty and students linked to. And lo and behold Gardner Campbell‘s personal home page was right there-front and center.

Gardner Campbell’s 1996 Personal Homepage at MWC

The page links to his various courses for that semester, has an image of his kids as the header, and a whole series of relevant, scholarly and personal sources below. Hell, I was even able to listen to a recording of “My Favorite Town” (a song he wrote, produced, and perfomed) on his bio page. The genre of the personal home page was in full effect already in 1996.

@jimgroom FWIW “Genres and the Web: Is the personal home page the first uniquely digital genre?” https://t.co/JFcBZV38tP — Alan Levine (@cogdog) February 10, 2014

And this genre was not limited to faculty, below is a screenshot of Molly Barber’s  home page from Fall 1996.

Molly Barber’s homepage at MWC circa 1996

The following image is a scan of a tutorial (which I got from Andy Rush who started me down this rabbit hole) Jim Greenberg  wrote about creating personal web pages at SUNY Oneonta. If you read it, you’ll notice users had to create the www directory, change permissions, FTP files, write HTML, etc. In other words, creating and managing a personal webpage on universities servers back in the mid-90s wasn’t simple.

But, at the same time, it was an option that was empowering. A larger number of schools from small liberal arts colleges to big universities provided their students and faculty with personal web space. This was on par with the cutting edge services of the time like GeoCities—which also emerged in 1995. What GeoCities did well (and universities did not) was to use frontier and other spatial metaphors to link the folks exploring and writing on the web with “homesteaders” and pioneers that were building the virutal cities and neighborhoods of tomorrow. They featured their work and designed the entire site to promote community. To my knowledge, I don’t know of any universities that tried this out with their personal web spaces. Does anyone out there have any examples of something like this?

Here is a my personal favorite webpage on GeoCities from 1996.

Another thing GeoCities figured out that universities didn’t was how to make creating personal web pages as easy as possible. They created a GUI interface for uploading files, managing those files, and editing HTML—not dissimilar from something like a streamlined CPanel.

As a result, by 1999 when it was sold to Yahoo! for $3.7 billion, GeoCities was the third most popular site on the internet behind AOL and Yahoo! The dot.com boom was in full effect, and GeoCities was a model of social space on the web. The rest is history, a decade later Yahoo! closed Geocities and effectively trashed a whole swath of internet history.

Thanks to the Archive Team‘s Herculean efforts, much of the GeoCities community was preserved and made available for free download a year after the shutdown. One terrabyte of data from the kilobyte age as Olia Lialina and Dragan Espenschied describe it as part of the cultural study/art project they’re designed around the terrabyte dump of more than a decade of web culture. Their work is truly inspiring and as Dragan recently posted:

The tumblr blog One Terabyte Of Kilobyte Age Photo Oppresents one way to make it all accessible, by transforming it into an exciting soap opera of screen shots.

With the Geocities Research Institute’s latest effort, categorizing the home pages can go as easily as checking tumblr: When accessed through the Geocities proxy server, each post is connected with the local database, widgets to view and modify the displayed home page’s metadata are inserted into tumblr.

It’s pretty awesome to think that after the corporate apocalypse that leveled GeoCities to internet kipple, a motley band of artists and archivists are picking up the pieces. Sadly, but not surprisingly, universities are nowhere to be found in this work—we’re too busy running conferences and doing digital humanities 🙂

On that note, while going through the Geocities FAQ from 1996 I stumbled upon this gem under the “What is GeoCities all about section?”:

We aspire to be positive contributors to this new culture. We’re committed to developing innovative ways to foster the spirit of community that is so vital to the future success of the Internet and the World Wide Web.

And under the “What is GeoCities hoping to accomplish?” section I found this:

Our homesteading initiative is just the first step in building World Wide Web based communities that are destined to become a vital part of the Net. Please send us an E-Mail if you’re interested in learning more about helping build the societies of the New Frontier.

What?! This is from the GeoCities FAQ? The idealism of the web was at full rhetorical throttle. This doesn’t sound like a business FAQ, this sounds like…like magic. A vision of a web that I would like to believe universities, the guardians of culture, would have taken on the responsibility for fostering. Promoting a generative web by cultivating distributed communities of open publishing at the institutions that helped build and create the culture for the internet more generally.

But, instead we got this….

LMS

The blackbox for online publishing that was and is the learning management system (LMS). Like the pinetree deodorizers hanging from rearview mirrors, you could find one in every college and university. And as the world of Web 2.0 came around in the early 2000s the LMS became the rationale for dismissing blogs, wikis, and social media out of hand, while at the same time systematically discontinuing these personal web spaces provided on campuses without replacing them with anything else. The last relic of campus publishing spaces that tried, however pathetically at that late stage, to empower students and faculty alike were gone. So as we’re waking up from the hangover of a decade of innvoation lost at the hands of the LMS we are greeted with the corporate MOOC. As Mike Caulfield notes so brilliantly, it’s not Groundhog’s Day it’s Memento.

And where is the web in all this? Why are we surprised that we’re still pulling teeth as instructional technologists to get faculty and students to recognize the value of the open web when it comes to teaching and learning? For more than a decade the web has been systematically ghettoized as a dangerous space where people steal and victims are robbed (not entirely false, but not the whole story either). It’s during the Napster era that these educational safe spaces were introduced to “protect” our communities from the web, insulating us from what was possible at an astronomical cost. The fear and loathing surrounding the internet, copyright, and downloading that enabled universities during the late 90s to shutoff the web for anything beyond basic business operations is best summed up for me in the :38 second GI Joe PSA “Stop All the Downloading.”

And that’s basically the historical frame for the presentation as it relates to edtech. It’s not perfect, and it’s not done, but I will be presenting a few more iterations of this argument at least two or three more times over the next month. So any and all feedback is more than welcome.

I rushed through the final slides about how Domain of One’s Own tries to revisit the idea of web publishing at unviersities that breaks beyond the lip service to social media and the inevitability of the LMS and/or MOOCs. It’s time for universities to integrate the web into their culture across disciplines as a basic ingredient of literacy. But more on that anon, this post is way too long as it is, and I got to get some sleep. Here’s the slides for the presentation if you’re interested, and the video should be here at minute 34:00. That said, if you are short for time watch the presentation before mine by Jonathan Worth, as well as the one after by Kristen Swanson. They were much better than me 🙂

Posted in Domain of One's Own, presentations | Tagged , , , | 23 Comments

Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow (1963)

Antonella and I watched Vittorio de Sica’s 1963 comedy Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow (Ieri, oggi, domani) last night, and it was a lot of fun. It’s an anthology film consisting of three short stories about couples in different parts of Italy. Both Sophia Loren and Marcello Mastroianni play the various couples for all three shorts, and they were awesome. I enjoyed all three stories, but the  second one where Loren plays the rich wife of a Milanese industrialist and Mastroianni her timid lover was brilliant. A terse, poignant and somewhat surreal critique of the bourgeoisie. It almost seemed like de Sica was dialing up some Antonioni and Bunuel at the same time.

The film won the Academy Award for Best Foreign Language Film in 1964. It’s currently streaming on netflix, and if you are looking for something to watching, it comes highly recommended.

Posted in movies | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment